雄伯手記970709b

雄伯手記970709b

 

    自金門回台北的飛機途中,閱讀到寶來證券總裁澎湖落海的新聞,回花蓮的第二天又看到青年情侶分手時殺害對方,然後自己跳樓自戕的電視報導。似乎,精明幹練的企業家跟販夫走卒一樣,也逃脫不了尊嚴受辱,情何以堪的憂鬱症的侵襲。

 

    在大陸搭乘長途汽車旅行,最常出現在心頭的問題是:為何而來?如何玩法?目的與方法這兩個問題,孰先孰後,在我旅途中始終困擾著我。儘管我一再強調我目的不在名勝古蹟,景點風光,可是我每到一個定點,還是無法擺脫一日或數日遊的誘惑,否則僅在市區或車站附近閒逛,也是無聊得很。

 

   回來後閱讀德勒斯Deleuze及瓜達里Guattari的「反伊底普斯」Anti-oedipus,有這麼一段頗獲我心:

 

In examining the problem of the subject, the behind-the-scenes reactive and reactionary man, Anti-Oedipus develops an approach that is decidedly diagnostic ( “ What constitutes our sickness today?” and profoundly healing as well. What it attempts to cure us of is the cure itself. Deleuze and Guattari term their approach “ schizoanalysis,” which they oppose on every count to psychoanalysis. Where the latter measures everything against neurosis and castration , schizoanalysis begins with the schizo, his breakdowns and his breakthroughs. For, they affirm, “ a schizophrenic out for a walk is a better model than a neurotic lying on the analyst’s couch…”

 

審查主體、反動的幕後、及反動人的問題,反伊底普斯提出的方法是絕對診斷式的(我們今天的病因是什麼?)也是深具療效式。它所企圖要治療的就是治療本身。德勒斯跟瓜達里稱這種方法為(精神分析),完全迴異於(心理分析)。後者主要是在處理治療神經質及去勢,而精神分析則是開始於精神病患的崩潰及突破。他們宣稱:「寧可當在外行走的精神病患,不當躺在分析師長椅上的神經質病患。」

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: