The Anti-Oedipus Papers 04

Anti-Oedipus 04

By Felix Guanttari 瓜達里

Translated by Springhero 雄伯

I would like to repeat one thing: it’s that originally in “ From One Sign to the Other” I was criticizing Lacan: I believe that the single trait was not appropriate for a general semiology, but that the sign-point should be.

  我想要重申一件事:原先在「符號的遞變」,我批判拉崗。我認為單一特徵對於一般符號學是不適當,但是符號點應該是適當。

  But the single trait is the differentiating phallus that founds the notion of identity in the mirror—hollow identity , identity of lack, etc.

   但是單一特徵是拉崗以區分的陽具建立鏡中影象認同的觀念。那其實是空洞的認同,欠缺的認同,等等。

  Whereas the sign-point is the cancerous contamination for set theory.

  而符號點是集合理論的癌症般的污染。

  The subject is not a signifying operator; nor even a signifying operator! It’s nothing. It’s anti-productive syncretistic abbreviation. Like Oedipus, it works against desiring production.

  主體不是符號化的運作者,連符號化的運作者都不是。主體是空無。主體是反生產的融合縮寫。像伊底普斯,主體從事反對生產欲望。

  The Freudian unconscious has no subject. Returning to Freud requires not putting any in there, at whatever cost!

  佛洛伊德的無意識沒有主體。回到佛洛伊德要求不放置任何東西在那裡,不管是什麼代價。

  The craziest machines, Freud’s machines—neurobiological whatever they were—were already kind of like that.

   最瘋狂的機械,佛洛伊德的機械,相當像是生物神經系統,或類似的名稱。

  You work in unconsciousness like you work in electronics or metallurgy. You have to establish production units.

   你的無意識運作,就像是電子學或冶金術。你必須建立生產單位。

  It’s not about impotence, but the revolutionary composition of production vectors. A strategy of enunciation that replicates production and institution, etc., discourse.

  這不是關於無能,而是生產向量的革命組合。一個表達的策略,複製生產跟機構等等學科

  In Lacan, there are some ambivalent statements like: “ The bipolarity that Moral Law adopts is simply the re-splitting of the subject using every intervention on the part of the signifier: specifically, the subject of enunciation or the subject of the statement” “ or the fact that the statement of authority “ has no other guarantee than its very enunciation”), and total conformism to institutions.

  拉崗有些模稜兩可的陳述:「道德法則所採用的兩極,就是主體使用符號具的不斷介入重新分裂:明確地說,表達的主體或陳述的主體。」(或是權威的陳述,除了自己的表達,沒有其他保證),以及全部跟體制一致。

P34—p35

The Anti-Oedipus Papers by Felix Guattari 瓜達里

Translated by Springhero 雄伯

https://springhero.wordpress.com

32hsiung@pchome.com.tw

  

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: